I support project teams in establishing model quality control workflows that prevent coordination issues, reduce rework, and ensure consistent deliverables across all disciplines.
My background includes multi-disciplinary coordination, manufacturer library development, and ACC / Navisworks / Solibri issue workflows, which allows me to approach quality not just at geometry level, but at data and deliverable level.
I have performed and set up quality check workflows for:
Architectural, Structural, and MEP models
Federated coordination models and clash review processes
Manufacturer BIM libraries
ACC Model Coordination, Navisworks Manage, and Solibri
My approach focuses on:
Model clarity and predictable behavior
Consistent naming & shared parameters
Performance stability
Deliverable alignment for coordination, QTO, and documentation
The goal is not only to “check models,” but to create repeatable, scalable quality workflows that teams can apply independently
Yes — I select the platform based on your contract structure, data needs, and team maturity.
Yes — I can create repeatable checklists, parameter filters, view templates, and issue cycles so quality control becomes a process, not a one-time event.
Yes — the most effective workflow is early QC at package creation, not at clash stage.
Yes. Training and documentation are available as optional add-ons so teams can maintain quality long-term.
Yes — model correction, optimization, performance improvement, and refactoring can be added as a separate scope.